Archive | Blog RSS feed for this section

Green Data Centers

Yahoo unveiled a new data center in Lockport, New York today, boasting one of the most energy-efficient data centers in the world – and exemplifying the push among big Internet companies to green data storage.

The new data center boasts some nice stats — the company says it will use 40 percent less energy and 95 percent less water than conventional data centers. Yahoo says its power-use effectiveness (PUE) for the facility is 1.08, which means 92 percent of power consumption goes towards actual computing, not ancillary things like lighting and cooling.

The data center will be powered in part by hydropower and reduce energy costs to one cent for cooling for every dollar spent on electricity. It was built with the help of a $9.9 million grant from the Department of Energy.

The issue of green data storage is one that’s growing in importance. The EPA  has expressed concern about the growing energy consumption of data centers. And operating storage centers and cooling servers has become a growing cost for the IT industry. Storage capacity needed by the average Fortune 1000 company doubles every 10 months, according to  an Accenture report, and data centers can use 100 times the electricity per square foot of a typical office building.

There are public relations implications too, as green advocates turn their eyes to energy-gobbling data storage centers. For the past few weeks, Facebook has been under fire from Greenpeace for its plans to build a data center in Oregon that will use energy from a coal-burning source, though Facebook initially touted some of the centers energy-efficiency measures. Greenpeace released Friday a  cartoon satire of “The Social Network” movie that zings the social media giant for opting not to use wind energy and not committing to renewable resources.

Given the pressing demands on both the cost and company image side of the equation, data storage efficiency has grabbed the spotlight — and a number of players are trying to gain traction. Proposals range from power management software — Power Assure, for example, announced today a data optimization software that can cut energy consumption up to 50 percent –  to ideas such as dunking servers in a cooling oil bath.

Even data center owners themselves are tempted to best each other, such as with Yahoo’s announcement today. Google also touts the energy efficiency numbers of its facilities. Google’s quarterly average PUE is 1.17, but as Green Tech Media notes, its overall ratings are probably better than Yahoo’s overall numbers. There’s still plenty of room for improvement in the industry: As the article reports, “Typical data centers have a PUE of 1.92, which means that roughly half of the power goes to things that aren’t computers.”

Yahoo’s situation is interesting because the company has designed its own data center, choosing a location with cool weather and winds. Its self-named “chicken coop” design is exactly as it sounds, inspired by the long, narrow architecture of chicken coops. The result: air moves through the building naturally and cools the servers without the usual need to crank up the air conditioning (and in turn, high electricity bills).

In one noteworthy departure from the norm, though, Google, Amazon, Nokia and Microsoft teamed up earlier this year to fight a new data center standard that would require companies to install a specific device that circulates ambient air to cool down servers. The companies argued that they needed leg room to experiment and innovate with other efficiency measures.

Comments are closed

Solar and Storage

Can the electric grid handle the growing flow of wind and solar that will come online in the next few years? According toa report out Friday from the California Independent System Operator (Cal ISO), which runs the state’s grid, the answer is yes. . . with a few caveats. In particular Cal ISO needs to help shape policies around the integration of energy storage.

California’s renewable portfolio standard, which says that 20 percent of a utility’s electricity needs have to come from renewables by 2010, will lead to a cumulative capacity of 2,246 megawatts for solar and 6,688 megawatts for wind in the state by 2012 (the 2010 deadline comes with a grace period for utilities). But Cal ISO expects that with the addition of all that solar and wind, conventional, natural-gas power plants will be turned on and off more often, by 35 percent, to make up for any excess or shortfall of power from the variable nature of wind and solar.

Cal ISO found that there are a variety of things it needs to do to make sure the addition of wind and solar to the grid goes smoothly, including pursuing incentives and rules to attract and curtail the amount of renewable energy being fed to the grid, and turning to more cutting-edge weather forecasting tools to estimate in advance the likely output from wind and solar farms.

But one of the most important moves over the long run will be to make sure that policies around energy storage will enable the economical integration of novel storage technologies on the grid. The report doesn’t go into details about this missing piece, but the fact is the Cal ISO has already been lobbying the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) on how to classify new storage technologies that could help grid operators manage the supply and demand of the grid. Cal ISO wants FERC to treat most storage systems as a form of energy generation rather than transmission, a distinction that affects how storage system owners get paid and, by extension, which emerging technologies could find warmer reception in the near term.

Cal ISO contends that storage can safe-keep the power for long hours but also inject it into the grid at a short notice, so it should be considered a generation asset that gets wholesale market prices, said Gregg Fishman, a spokesman for CalISO. If it’s counted as a transmission asset, then its owner can get a guaranteed recovery of the investment from rate payers.

Cal ISO already treats pumped hydro, a conventional technology, as generation, Fishman said. A pumped hydro operation uses excess electricity to move water uphill to a reservoir and let it run downstream to turbine generators when electricity rates are higher.

Similar discussions about how to regulate storage are happening throughout other parts of the country. New York ISO, for example, has gotten approval from FERC to set rules that say electricity from batteries and fly wheels can fetch market prices set specifically for power that is used to balance the grid. Beacon Power has gotten a federal loan guarantee for $43 million to build a 20-megawatt flywheel energy storage operation in New York.AES Energy has snagged $17.1 million in federal loan guarantees to build a 20-megawatt storage plant in New York using A123Systems’ lithium-ion batteries.

While regulators figure out how to marry storage technologies with the grid, companies such as SunPower and SolarCity are looking at packaging storage systems with solar electric systems for businesses and homes. Both have gotten grants from California to figure out the costs and benefits of adding storage.

SunPower has gotten nearly $1.86 million to see how batteries and ice energy can be a good fit for solar energy systems it sells to commercial customers, who have to deal with a more complex rate structure. “For net metering, residential rates tend to be simpler than commercial rates,” said Julie Blunden, executive vice president of public policy and corporate communications. “You might arrange your solar and storage to maximize of your net metering.”

SolarCity, meanwhile, is looking into the possibly of adding storage to its offering in the future. The installer has gotten $1.77 million from California to see if lithium-ion batteries are a good fit for residential solar electric systems and teamed up with with Tesla Motors, which will provide the batteries for six, yet disclosed, test sites.

Comments are closed